The decline of the Persian language in South Asia is a multifaceted phenomenon that intertwines with the region's political, cultural, and educational transformations, particularly during the British colonial period. Once a dominant language of administration and culture under various Muslim dynasties, faced systematic erosion due to colonial policies that sought to reshape educational frameworks and cultural identities. The British East India Company's ascendancy was the beginning of the end of South Asian Persian. In 1837, Persian was officially abolished as a language of administration and was replaced by English and vernacular languages like Urdu.
The decline of Persian was also part of a broader cultural imperialism strategy, where British authorities sought to impose their language and culture as superior. This not only served to delegitimize local languages like Persian but also aimed to reshape societal values and identities in favour of colonial norms, thus solidifying British dominance over cultural narratives.
The Orientalist-Anglicist Debates on Persian Education in British India
The Orientalist-Anglicist controversy emerged in the late 18th and early 19th centuries, representing a fundamental disagreement on educational approaches. Orientalists, such as Sir William Jones and Warren Hastings, advocated for the preservation and promotion of Indian languages and cultures, including Persian, viewing them as vital to understanding Indian civilization. In contrast, Anglicists argued for English as the medium of education, believing it was essential for civilizing and modernizing Indian society.
The debate reached a critical point with Thomas Babington Macaulay's Minute on Education in 1835, which favored English over classical Indian languages like Persian. Macaulay dismissed the relevance of Persian education for creating a compliant colonial populace, effectively sidelining it in favor of an English-centric curriculum. This shift marked a turning point that formalized English as the primary language of instruction in government schools.
Following Macaulay’s Minute, the British colonial government introduced educational policies that systematically marginalized Persian. Government schools began to emphasize English and vernacular languages while offering only limited instruction in Persian, often devoid of its rich literary context. This approach aimed to pacify the people but fail to integrate Persian meaningfully into the educational framework.
Pre-Colonial Persian Pedagogy in South Asia
Pre-colonial Persian education was deeply embedded in the Indo-Islamic tradition and Indo-Persian culture. It emphasized classical literature, poetry, and skills like epistolography (letter writing) and poetic composition. Students were taught to appreciate works by renowned poets and authors, which served to reinforce cultural identity.
Instruction was often conducted in informal settings such as the teacher's home or community spaces. The pedagogy relied heavily on memorization, oral recitation, and phonetic training. The learning process was interactive, with students expected to engage deeply with the material through recitation and discussion, fostering a strong connection to the cultural heritage of the language.
The guru, or the Ustad, (teacher) played a central role in pre-colonial education, guiding students through personalized instruction tailored to their individual needs and abilities. This relationship was characterized by respect and submission from students, emphasizing the importance of mentorship in learning.
Education was closely tied to community needs and values. The curriculum often included practical subjects relevant to local contexts, ensuring that learning was applicable to daily life and societal roles.
Persian Education in modern-day Pakistan, India and Bangladesh during the British Raj
Colonial educators systematically purged many Indo-Persian texts from the curriculum, particularly those that referenced local geographies or cultural practices. Works that were deemed more "classical" or morally acceptable by British standards were taught, albeit extracted from their broader literary contexts and presented in a manner that stripped them of their cultural significance.
The focus shifted to grammar-based instruction with less emphasis on oral recitation and memorization of classical texts that had previously characterized Persian pedagogy. This change not only altered how students engaged with the language but also impacted their understanding of its literary and cultural nuances.
The British administration implemented reforms that included grants to indigenous schools, but these often came with stipulations that undermined traditional Persian education. By promoting government-style textbooks and curricula, colonial authorities sought to standardize education while diminishing the role of locally-run schools that had previously provided rich instruction in Persian literature.
The colonial approach not only targeted the educational framework but also contributed to the alienation of Persianate culture from South Asian identity. By framing Persian as irrelevant and foreign, the British effectively severed historical ties between the language and its practitioners, making it difficult for subsequent generations to access their literary heritage.
The loss of access to classical Persian literature meant that much of the philosophical, poetic, and historical discourse that shaped Indo-Persian culture was effectively erased from collective memory.
Colonial Aspirations in and beyond India
During the Great Game, the natural alliance between empires in the Indian Subcontinent, Persia, the Ottomons, and the Russians, posed a significant threat to British interests in India and the surrounding regions. By promoting English over Persian, the British aimed to weaken cultural and political ties among these nations. Persian was a language of diplomacy and culture that facilitated communication and alliances among various regional powers. Its decline would disrupt these connections, thereby reducing the likelihood of coordinated opposition to British hegemony in the region.
The British also propelled the usage of vernacular languages - often causing linguistic minorities in the area to feel alienated. This tactic aimed to exploit ethnic tensions and create divisions among local populations, thereby weakening potential resistance against colonial rule. By fostering competition between languages, the British could maintain control over diverse communities by preventing unified opposition.
The geopolitical landscape during the Great Game necessitated that Britain maintain buffer states between its territories and Russian advances. By promoting English and diminishing Persian influence, Britain aimed to create a loyal administrative class that would support its strategic objectives in Afghanistan and Persia, ensuring that these regions remained under British influence rather than falling into Russian hands.
The Case of Afghanistan
The British colonial efforts to diminish the Persian language in Afghanistan were intricately linked to the rise of the Pashtuns, a minority group that was strategically elevated to a position of power and majority influence.
However, as the British sought to consolidate their control in the region, they recognized that fostering Pashtun nationalism was essential for undermining Persian's dominance. By promoting Pashto as a national language and marginalizing Persian, the British enabled Pashtun elites to assert their authority over other ethnic groups.
This process involved not only the systematic replacement of Persian terms in administration and education with Pashto equivalents but also an ideological campaign that framed Pashto as a symbol of Afghan identity. Consequently, this strategic elevation of Pashtuns transformed them from a minority into a powerful majority, reshaping Afghanistan’s linguistic landscape and cultural identity while effectively sidelining Persian.
Consequently, this colonial legacy has had lasting effects on Afghanistan’s contemporary linguistic and cultural identity, contributing to ethnic tensions which were later exploited during the Soviet Invasion, and the American Invasion which followed.
List of References:
"Chapter 4: Persian, Farsi, Dari, Tajiki Language Names and Variants" - repository.upenn.
"Colonial Education Policy and the Decline of Persian Language in South Asia" - Deshbandhu College.
"Colonial Legacies Challenging State Building in Afghanistan" - digitalcommons.bard.
"Education - Ancient Societies, Literacy, Pedagogy" - Britannica.
"Education, Language, and Indigenous Peoples" - World Bank Blogs.
"Education System in Pre-Colonial Period in India" - jetir.
"Historical Significance of the British Education System in Colonial Punjab" - pssr.org.
"Identifying and Classifying the Challenges of Persian Language Education" - lrr.modares.ac.
"Landscape, Race, and Power on the Indo-Afghan Frontier, c.1840-c.1880" - discovery.ucl.ac.
"Orientalist-Anglicist Controversy" - GeeksforGeeks.
"Persian Language Dominance and the Loss of Minority Languages in Iran" - scirp.
"Persian Studies in India and the Colonial Universities, 1857–1947" - Cambridge.
"The Intellectual Impact of Colonialism and the Urgency of Decolonizing" - Middle East Institute.
"The Iran Question and British Strategy" - Policy Exchange.
"The Politics of Persian Language Education in Colonial India" - ajammc.
Comments